A Comparative Examination of Multi-Party Actions: The Case of Environmental Mass Harm 9781509905294

Варианты приобретения

Цена: 11088.00р.
Кол-во:
Наличие: Поставка под заказ. Есть в наличии на складе поставщика.
Склад Америка: Есть
При оформлении заказа до:
Ориентировочная дата поставки:
При условии наличия книги у поставщика.

Добавить в корзину

в Мои желания

Автор: Joanne Blennerhassett
Название: A Comparative Examination of Multi-Party Actions: The Case of Environmental Mass Harm
ISBN: 9781509905294
Издательство: Bloomsbury Academic
Классификация:

Сравнительное правоведение

Гражданское судопроизводство, судебное разбирательства и разрешение споров

Экологические нормы права

ISBN-10: 1509905294
Обложка/Формат: Hardback
Страницы: 344
Вес: 0.77 кг.
Дата издания: 20.10.2016
Серия: Civil justice systems
Язык: English
Размер: 180 x 251 x 30
Читательская аудитория: Tertiary education (us: college)
Ключевые слова: Civil procedure, litigation & dispute resolution, LAW / Civil Procedure
Основная тема: Civil procedure, litigation & dispute resolution,LAW / Civil Procedure
Подзаголовок: The case of environmental mass harm
Рейтинг:
Поставляется из: Англии
Описание: This monograph addresses the phenomenon of mass harm and how it may be resolved through collective redress. It examines particularly how such redress may be achieved through mechanisms such as multi-party actions (MPAs). In order to do this, an analytical framework is created against which to evaluate various multi-party procedures. This is illustrated through the experience of a selection of common law jurisdictions in dealing with mass harm – namely that of England and Wales, Canada, Australia and the United States, as well as that of EU collective redress. It examines multi-party action laws benchmarked against the objectives identified in the analytical framework. The phenomenon of environmental mass harm in particular is explored as a case study, as it illustrates some of the difficulties that may arise in mass harm litigation. Also, this work explores where the best solutions for mass harm redress may lie in the future – perhaps in collective actions or through alternatives such as regulation and alternative dispute resolution or a combination of these. Finally, the experience of mass harm litigation in Ireland is examined, as currently this jurisdiction does not have an effective mechanism for dealing with mass harm.
Дополнительное описание: Part I: Collective Redress, Mass Harm, Multi-party Actions and Environmental Mass Harm 1. Introduction 2. Collective Redress and Mass Harm 3. Objectives of MPAs 4. Environmental Mass Harm and Collective Redress Part II: Comparative Law Experience

A Comparative Examination of Multi-Party Actions: The Case of Environmental Mass Harm, Joanne Blennerhassett