Контакты/Проезд  Доставка и Оплата Помощь/Возврат
История
  +7(495) 980-12-10
  пн-пт: 10-18 сб,вс: 11-18
  shop@logobook.ru
   
    Поиск книг                    Поиск по списку ISBN Расширенный поиск    
Найти
  Зарубежные издательства Российские издательства  
Авторы | Каталог книг | Издательства | Новинки | Учебная литература | Акции | Хиты | |
 

Death of Treaty Supremacy, Sloss David L


Варианты приобретения
Цена: 11880.00р.
Кол-во:
Наличие: Поставка под заказ.  Есть в наличии на складе поставщика.
Склад Америка: Есть  
При оформлении заказа до: 2025-08-04
Ориентировочная дата поставки: Август-начало Сентября
При условии наличия книги у поставщика.

Добавить в корзину
в Мои желания

Автор: Sloss David L
Название:  Death of Treaty Supremacy
ISBN: 9780199364022
Издательство: Oxford Academ
Классификация:



ISBN-10: 0199364028
Обложка/Формат: Hardback
Страницы: 472
Вес: 0.82 кг.
Дата издания: 27.10.2016
Язык: English
Размер: 241 x 167 x 31
Читательская аудитория: General (us: trade)
Подзаголовок: An invisible constitutional change
Ссылка на Издательство: Link
Рейтинг:
Поставляется из: Англии
Описание: This book provides the first detailed history of the Constitutions treaty supremacy rule. It describes a process of invisible constitutional change. The traditional supremacy rule provided that all treaties supersede conflicting state laws; it precluded state governments from violating U.S.
treaty obligations. Before 1945, treaty supremacy and self-execution were independent doctrines. Supremacy governed the relationship between treaties and state law. Self-execution governed the division of power over treaty implementation between Congress and the President. In 1945, the U.S. ratified
the UN Charter, which obligates nations to promote human rights for all without distinction as to race. In 1950, a California court applied the Charters human rights provisions and the traditional treaty supremacy rule to invalidate a state law that discriminated against Japanese nationals. The
implications were shocking: the decision implied that the United States had effectively abrogated Jim Crow laws throughout the South by ratifying the UN Charter. In response, conservatives mobilized support for a constitutional amendment, known as the Bricker Amendment, to abolish the treaty
supremacy rule. The amendment never passed, but Brickers supporters achieved their goals through de facto constitutional change. The de facto Bricker Amendment created a novel exception to the treaty supremacy rule for non-self-executing (NSE) treaties. The exception permits state governments to
violate NSE treaties without authorization from the federal political branches. The death of treaty supremacy has significant implications for U.S. foreign policy and for U.S. compliance with its treaty obligations.



Must We Defend Nazis?: Why the First Amendment Should Not Protect Hate Speech and White Supremacy

Автор: Stefancic Jean, Delgado Richard
Название: Must We Defend Nazis?: Why the First Amendment Should Not Protect Hate Speech and White Supremacy
ISBN: 1479857831 ISBN-13(EAN): 9781479857838
Издательство: Mare Nostrum (Eurospan)
Рейтинг:
Цена: 2132.00 р.
Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ.

Описание: A controversial argument for reconsidering the limits of free speech

Swirling in the midst of the resurgence of neo-Nazi demonstrations, hate speech, and acts of domestic terrorism are uncomfortable questions about the limits of free speech. The United States stands apart from many other countries in that citizens have the power to say virtually anything without legal repercussions. But, in the case of white supremacy, does the First Amendment demand that we defend Nazis?

In Must We Defend Nazis?, legal experts Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic argue that it should not. Updated to consider the white supremacy demonstrations and counter-protests in Charlottesville and debates about hate speech on campus and on the internet, the book offers a concise argument against total, unchecked freedom of speech.

Delgado and Stefancic instead call for a system of free speech that takes into account the harms that hate speech can inflict upon disempowered, marginalized people. They examine the prevailing arguments against regulating speech, and show that they all have answers. They also show how limiting free speech would work in a legal framework and offer suggestions for activist lawyers and judges interested in approaching the hate speech controversy intelligently.

As citizens are confronting free speech in contention with equal dignity, access, and respect, Must We Defend Nazis? puts aside cliches that clutter First Amendment thinking, and presents a nuanced position that recognizes the needs of our increasingly diverse society.

Must We Defend Nazis?: Why the First Amendment Should Not Protect Hate Speech and White Supremacy

Автор: Stefancic Jean, Delgado Richard
Название: Must We Defend Nazis?: Why the First Amendment Should Not Protect Hate Speech and White Supremacy
ISBN: 1479887714 ISBN-13(EAN): 9781479887712
Издательство: Mare Nostrum (Eurospan)
Рейтинг:
Цена: 11161.00 р.
Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ.

Описание: A controversial argument for reconsidering the limits of free speech

Swirling in the midst of the resurgence of neo-Nazi demonstrations, hate speech, and acts of domestic terrorism are uncomfortable questions about the limits of free speech. The United States stands apart from many other countries in that citizens have the power to say virtually anything without legal repercussions. But, in the case of white supremacy, does the First Amendment demand that we defend Nazis?

In Must We Defend Nazis?, legal experts Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic argue that it should not. Updated to consider the white supremacy demonstrations and counter-protests in Charlottesville and debates about hate speech on campus and on the internet, the book offers a concise argument against total, unchecked freedom of speech.

Delgado and Stefancic instead call for a system of free speech that takes into account the harms that hate speech can inflict upon disempowered, marginalized people. They examine the prevailing arguments against regulating speech, and show that they all have answers. They also show how limiting free speech would work in a legal framework and offer suggestions for activist lawyers and judges interested in approaching the hate speech controversy intelligently.

As citizens are confronting free speech in contention with equal dignity, access, and respect, Must We Defend Nazis? puts aside cliches that clutter First Amendment thinking, and presents a nuanced position that recognizes the needs of our increasingly diverse society.


ООО "Логосфера " Тел:+7(495) 980-12-10 www.logobook.ru
   В Контакте     В Контакте Мед  Мобильная версия