Debating the Future of the ‘Responsibility to Protect`, G?zen Ercan

Автор: Benatar David, Wasserman David
Название: Debating Procreation: Is It Wrong to Preproduce?
ISBN: 0199333556 ISBN-13(EAN): 9780199333554
Издательство: Oxford Academ
Рейтинг:
Цена: 5067.00 р.
Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ.

Описание: While procreation is ubiquitous, attention to the ethical issues involved in creating children is relatively rare. The authors of Debating Procreation take opposing views on this important question.

Автор: Gardiner Stephen M.
Название: Debating Climate Ethics
ISBN: 0199996482 ISBN-13(EAN): 9780199996483
Издательство: Oxford Academ
Рейтинг:
Цена: 5463.00 р.
Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ.

Описание: Stephen M. Gardiner and David A. Weisbach present arguments for and against the relevance of ethics to global climate policy. Gardiner argues that climate change is fundamentally an ethical issue rather than one of narrow economic self-interest, while Weisbach argues that existing ethical theories are flawed and do not provide guidance for climate policy.

Автор: DeGrazia David, Hunt Lester H.
Название: Debating Gun Control
ISBN: 0190251263 ISBN-13(EAN): 9780190251260
Издательство: Oxford Academ
Рейтинг:
Цена: 3325.00 р.
Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ.

Описание: Americans have an ambivalent relationship to guns. The debate over the role of guns and gun regulations in American society tends to be acrimonious and misinformed.

Автор: Orford
Название: International Authority and the Responsibility to Protect
ISBN: 0521186382 ISBN-13(EAN): 9780521186384
Издательство: Cambridge Academ
Рейтинг:
Цена: 6653.00 р.
Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ.

Описание: The idea that states and the international community have a responsibility to protect populations has shaped debates about conflict prevention, humanitarian action, peacekeeping and territorial administration since 2001. This book offers a history, from Hobbes to the UN, of attempts to ground authority on the capacity to guarantee protection.