Anthem companion to ferdinand tonnies, 

The volume is divided into two parts, with the first devoted to aspects of Bourdieu's thought and the second discussing case-studies of the international deployment of his thought. The international list of contributors elaborate on the implications and consequences of Bourdieu's phenomenological orientation; explore the meaning of 'reflexivity' in Bourdieu's work offering, in the process, a comprehensive guide to relevant secondary literature; examine the validity of the ways in which Margaret Archer and Bernard Lahire have attempted to go beyond Bourdieu's original formulations; and spell out the implications of Bourdieu's thinking in relation to the possibility of an international social science. The contributors also provide a biometric analysis of the circulation of Bourdieu's ideas within Europe and offer interpretations of Bourdieu's work within their own national contexts rather than in terms of a shared discourse of international sociology.

The essays in the first part consider Veblen's method, philosophy and values. Sociologist Erkki Kilpinen peers deeply into Veblen's highly original theory of action and its implications for a sociological understanding of "the instinct of workmanship." In contrast, economist William Waller, building on contemporary work in evolutionary economics and psychology, urges a considerably more bio-psychological interpretation of Veblen's instinct theory. Intellectual historians Rick Tilman and Kohl Glau, exploring the secular foundations of Veblen's moral theory, furnish a sharp critique of recent efforts to wed Veblen with Catholic social thought. Challenging older understandings, Russell H. and Sylvia E. Bartley, careful students of Veblen's biography, offer novel insights into the impact of Veblen's education at Carlton College, while sociologist Stephan G. Mestrovic thoughtfully insists that Veblen unduly limited his affirmation of "idle curiosity" as a chief resource for learning to elite post graduate schools.

Contemporary applications of Veblen's theory to studies of capitalism, social structure and politics are the focus of the contributions in the next part. Anthropologist John Kelly forcefully urges a reconsideration of Veblen's critical theory as an inspiration for both students and activists in an age of capitalism "after post-modernism and post-coloniality." Returning to Veblen's most important early work, sociologist Ahmet Oncu skillfully weaves the theory of the leisure class into a rich and exciting re-interpretation of Turkey's Ottoman ruling groups. Building on Veblen's critical theory of absentee ownership and power, political scientist Sidney Plotkin analyzes Veblen's embrace of local forms of political economic self-rule, but notes Veblen's sense of the ideological ambiguity of popular resistance to centralized power. Finally, geographer Ross Mitchell applies the radical democratic potential of Veblen's concept of "the masterless man" to an understanding of both the possibilities and limits of contemporary left movements. Throughout, the essays offer fresh material for ongoing reconsiderations of Thorstein Veblen as a major theoretical resource for the contemporary social sciences.

Anthem Companions to Sociology offer authoritative and comprehensive assessments of major figures in the development of sociology from the last two centuries. Covering the major advancements in sociological thought, these companions offer critical evaluations of key figures in the American and European sociological tradition, and will provide students and scholars with an in-depth assessment of the makers of sociology and chart their relevance to modern society.

Part II, which includes chapters 7 through 11, focuses on two interrelated themes that characterize the late phase of Parsons's work: progressive evolution and the societal community. Beginning in the mid-1960s the process of evolution--both in its societal and cultural aspects--was given primary of place by Parsons in further explaining social differentiation and integration--but also, and more fundamentally, in dealing with the problem of social change. For Parsons, evolutionary development, with crucial cultural innovations taking place in the "seed-bed" societies of Israel and classical Greece, had culminated in modern society, which in the Western context brought about the industrial, democratic and education revolutions, and in the American context led to the development of an "institutionalized individualism" reinforced by the core value of "instrumental activism." Both of these latter concepts are given extensive treatment in Parsons's last book, the posthumously published American Society. Of special significance in this work is the notion of the societal community--particularly of the American variety--that Parsons contends contributes to internal integration though citizenship and the normatively defined obligations that citizenship engenders. In short, Part II demonstrates the importance that Parsons gave to modern civil society in general as well as to the exceptional status that he attributed to American society in particular.

Extant compendiums of Arendt's work show a strong bias toward philosophy and political theory. In contrast, The Anthem Companion to Hannah Arendt is written principally by sociologists and authors with a keen interest in sociology and social theory. The result is a genuinely original contribution to Arendt studies. Written with the higher level undergraduate student in mind yet sufficiently challenging to engage readers well versed in her work, the book examines Arendt's most important books as they bear on modern social theories, issues and disputes. Her key conceptual distinctions - totalitarianism and dictatorship; labor, work, action; power and violence; thinking, willing and judging - are clarified. The controversies in which Arendt was caught up - notably over the 'banality of evil' epitomized by Adolf Eichmann - are explained. The result enables students to grasp a fully rounded understanding of Arendt's contribution to social inquiry. Written by a distinguished group of international scholars, the clear descriptions and stimulating interpretations of The Anthem Companion to Hannah Arendt bring Arendt's work into the forefront of sociological discussion.

After a brief introductory overview of Karl Mannheim's intellectual career, "The Anthem Companion to Karl Mannheim" offers fresh commentaries and explorations by an international and presently active group of scholars. As the institutionalized understanding of Mannheim's sociology of knowledge project was so long shaped by the synthetic reading by the American sociologist Robert K. Merton--a classic in his own right--the companion opens with a careful exposition and critique of that authoritative interpretation. It is followed by a close reading of the considerations that led Mannheim to move beyond the neo-Kantian epistemology of his earlier training to the project of a sociological understanding of critical knowledge. Next to come is a series of studies that marked by perspectives derived from intellectual strategies developed since the breakdown of consensus on the approaches examined in the previous section. In their variety, the studies capture a number of perspectives opened up or expanded by an understanding of Mannheim's undertaking. The key terms are familiar: self-reflexivity, praxeological sociology, neo-realism, and dramatistic readings of world-views. The angles of vision differ, but they agree in projecting new and important light on Mannheim's efforts. At the end, attention is focused on some unfamiliar links between Mannheim's work and current interests: a study of Mannheim's influence on Hannah Arendt, who knew him as teacher in Heidelberg and Frankfurt; an inquiry into Mannheim's political thought from the standpoint of contemporary democratic political theory; and an examination of Mannheim's attention to the status of women and of the work done on these matters under his tutelage by a group of talented women students.

The idea of "The Anthem Companion to Karl Mannheim" is by no means to dismiss the work for which Mannheim has been best known, but it is to put that work in its particular context, as a multisided agenda rather than as a finished doctrine, to be accepted or rejected. The aim is to learn from Karl Mannheim.