Контакты/Проезд  Доставка и Оплата Помощь/Возврат
История
  +7(495) 980-12-10
  пн-пт: 10-18 сб,вс: 11-18
  shop@logobook.ru
   
    Поиск книг                    Поиск по списку ISBN Расширенный поиск    
Найти
  Зарубежные издательства Российские издательства  
Авторы | Каталог книг | Издательства | Новинки | Учебная литература | Акции | Хиты | |
 

Challenging Status Quo Retrenchment: New Directions in Critical Research, Tricia M. Kress, Curry Malott, Brad Porfilio


Варианты приобретения
Цена: 14137.00р.
Кол-во:
Наличие: Поставка под заказ.  Есть в наличии на складе поставщика.
Склад Америка: Есть  
При оформлении заказа до:
Ориентировочная дата поставки:
При условии наличия книги у поставщика.

Добавить в корзину
в Мои желания

Автор: Tricia M. Kress, Curry Malott, Brad Porfilio
Название:  Challenging Status Quo Retrenchment: New Directions in Critical Research
ISBN: 9781623960506
Издательство: Mare Nostrum (Eurospan)
Классификация:
ISBN-10: 1623960509
Обложка/Формат: Hardcover
Страницы: 275
Вес: 0.52 кг.
Дата издания: 30.10.2012
Серия: Education
Язык: English
Иллюстрации: 1, black & white illustrations
Размер: 234 x 156 x 16
Читательская аудитория: Professional and scholarly
Ключевые слова: Philosophy & theory of education
Подзаголовок: New directions in critical research
Рейтинг:
Поставляется из: Англии
Описание: 2012 marks ten years of No Child Left Behind and the U.S. federal governments official designation of what qualifies as scientifically based research (SBR) in education. Combined, these two policies have resulted in a narrowing of education via standardisation and high stakes testing (Au, 2007) as well as the curtailment of forms of inquiry that are deemed legitimate for examining education (Wright, 2006). <br><br>While there has been much debate about the benefits and limitations of the NCLB legislation (e.g., Au, 2010) and SBR (e.g., Eisenhart & Towne, 2003), critical researchers have held strong to their position: The reductionistic narrowing of education curricula and educational research cannot solve the present and historical inequities in society and education (Shields, 2012). Contrarily, reductionism (via standardisation and/or methodological prescription) exacerbates the challenges we face because it effectively erases the epistemological, ontological, and axiological diversity necessary for disrupting hegemonic social structures that lie at the root of human suffering (Kincheloe, 2004). Not only has NCLB proven incapable of overcoming inequalities, but there seems to be sufficient evidence to suggest it was never really intended to eliminate poverty and human suffering. That is, it seems NCLB, despite its lofty title and public discourse, is actually designed to advance the agenda of handing public education over to for-profit corporations to manage and privatise thereby intensifying the capitalist class war on those who rely on a wage to survive (Malott, 2010). <br><br>In the present ethos, reductionism upholds and retrenches the status quo (i.e. the basic structures of power), and it puts at risk education and educational research as means of working toward social justice (Biesta, 2007). Because social justice can be interpreted in multiple ways, we might note that we understand critical social justice as oriented toward action and social change. Thus, critical education and research may have potential to contribute to a number of social justice imperatives, such as: redistributing land from the neo-colonising settler-state to Indigenous peoples, halting exploitative labour relations and hazardous working conditions for wage-earners, and engaging in reparations with formerly enslaved communities.


Challenging Status Quo Retrenchment: New Directions in Critical Research

Автор: Tricia M. Kress, Curry Malott, Brad Porfilio
Название: Challenging Status Quo Retrenchment: New Directions in Critical Research
ISBN: 1623960495 ISBN-13(EAN): 9781623960490
Издательство: Mare Nostrum (Eurospan)
Рейтинг:
Цена: 7623.00 р.
Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ.

Описание: 2012 marks ten years of No Child Left Behind and the U.S. federal government's official designation of what qualifies as ""scientifically based research"" (SBR) in education. Combined, these two policies have resulted in a narrowing of education via standardisation and high stakes testing (Au, 2007) as well as the curtailment of forms of inquiry that are deemed legitimate for examining education (Wright, 2006). <br><br>While there has been much debate about the benefits and limitations of the NCLB legislation (e.g., Au, 2010) and SBR (e.g., Eisenhart & Towne, 2003), critical researchers have held strong to their position: The reductionistic narrowing of education curricula and educational research cannot solve the present and historical inequities in society and education (Shields, 2012). Contrarily, reductionism (via standardisation and/or methodological prescription) exacerbates the challenges we face because it effectively erases the epistemological, ontological, and axiological diversity necessary for disrupting hegemonic social structures that lie at the root of human suffering (Kincheloe, 2004). Not only has NCLB proven incapable of overcoming inequalities, but there seems to be sufficient evidence to suggest it was never really intended to eliminate poverty and human suffering. That is, it seems NCLB, despite its lofty title and public discourse, is actually designed to advance the agenda of handing public education over to for-profit corporations to manage and privatise thereby intensifying the capitalist class' war on those who rely on a wage to survive (Malott, 2010). <br><br>In the present ethos, reductionism upholds and retrenches the status quo (i.e. the basic structures of power), and it puts at risk education and educational research as means of working toward social justice (Biesta, 2007). Because social justice can be interpreted in multiple ways, we might note that we understand critical social justice as oriented toward action and social change. Thus, critical education and research may have potential to contribute to a number of social justice imperatives, such as: redistributing land from the neo-colonising settler-state to Indigenous peoples, halting exploitative labour relations and hazardous working conditions for wage-earners, and engaging in reparations with formerly enslaved communities.

Rights and Retrenchment

Автор: Burbank
Название: Rights and Retrenchment
ISBN: 1107136997 ISBN-13(EAN): 9781107136991
Издательство: Cambridge Academ
Рейтинг:
Цена: 16632.00 р.
Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ.

Описание: In Rights and Retrenchment, the authors show that an increasingly conservative, unelected Supreme Court has undermined the enforcement of federal rights with little public notice. This book will be of interest to students, scholars, and citizens concerned about rights and their enforcement.


ООО "Логосфера " Тел:+7(495) 980-12-10 www.logobook.ru
   В Контакте     В Контакте Мед  Мобильная версия