Контакты/Проезд  Доставка и Оплата Помощь/Возврат
История
  +7(495) 980-12-10
  пн-пт: 10-18 сб,вс: 11-18
  shop@logobook.ru
   
    Поиск книг                    Поиск по списку ISBN Расширенный поиск    
Найти
  Зарубежные издательства Российские издательства  
Авторы | Каталог книг | Издательства | Новинки | Учебная литература | Акции | Хиты | |
 

Mechanics of claims and permissible killing in war, Walen, Alec D. (professor Of Law, Philosophy, And Criminal Justice, Rutgers University)


Варианты приобретения
Цена: 8712.00р.
Кол-во:
Наличие: Поставка под заказ.  Есть в наличии на складе поставщика.
Склад Америка: Есть  
При оформлении заказа до: 2025-08-04
Ориентировочная дата поставки: Август-начало Сентября
При условии наличия книги у поставщика.

Добавить в корзину
в Мои желания

Автор: Walen, Alec D. (professor Of Law, Philosophy, And Criminal Justice, Rutgers University)
Название:  Mechanics of claims and permissible killing in war
ISBN: 9780190872045
Издательство: Oxford Academ
Классификация:


ISBN-10: 0190872047
Обложка/Формат: Hardcover
Страницы: 264
Вес: 0.50 кг.
Дата издания: 15.06.2019
Язык: English
Размер: 166 x 242 x 30
Читательская аудитория: General (us: trade)
Ссылка на Издательство: Link
Рейтинг:
Поставляется из: Англии
Описание: According to the dominant account of rights, there are two ways to permissibly kill people: they have done something to forfeit their right to life, or their rights are outweighed by the significantly greater cost of respecting them. Contemporary just war theorists tend to agree that it is
difficult to justify killing in the second way. Thus, they focus on the conditions under which rights might be forfeited. But it has proven hard to defend an account of forfeiture that permits killing when and only when it is morally justifiable.

In The Mechanics of Claims and Permissible Killing in War, Alec D. Walen develops an alternative account of rights according to which rights forfeiture has a much smaller role to play. It plays a smaller role because rights themselves are more contextually contingent. They systematically reflect the
different kinds of claims people can make on an agent. For example, those who threaten to cause harm without a right to do so have weaker claims not to be killed than innocent bystanders or those who have a right to threaten to cause harm. By framing rights as the output of a balance of competing
claims, and by laying out a detailed account of how to balance competing claims, Walen provides a more coherent account of when killing in war is permissible.



ООО "Логосфера " Тел:+7(495) 980-12-10 www.logobook.ru
   В Контакте     В Контакте Мед  Мобильная версия