The Metaethics of Constitutional Adjudication, Tripkovic Bosko
Автор: John Bell, Mark Elliott, Jason NE Varuhas, Philip Название: Public Law Adjudication in Common Law Systems: Process and Substance ISBN: 1849469911 ISBN-13(EAN): 9781849469913 Издательство: Bloomsbury Academic Рейтинг: Цена: 15840.00 р. Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ.
Описание: This volume arises from the inaugural Public Law Conference hosted in September 2014 by the Centre for Public Law at the University of Cambridge, which brought together leading public lawyers from different common law jurisdictions, providing for the first time a comparative analysis of process and substance in public law adjudication in common law systems. While those from common law jurisdictions share background understandings, significant differences between such systems create opportunities for valuable exchanges of ideas and debate. The majority of the chapters consider topical issues in judicial review. Chapters adopting a theoretical perspective explore the trend towards conceptualising administrative law in terms of 'public reason'; elaborate a values-based framework for analysing administrative law; and propound a public interest conception of public law. Chapters adopting a contextual or empirical approach consider the impact of public law adjudication on government, and governmental responses to judicial decisions. Other chapters consider how procedure and substantive law have interacted historically in the field of judicial review. Concluding chapters reflect generally on the papers in the collection and the value of facilitating cross-jurisdictional dialogue. (Series: Hart Studies in Comparative Public Law) Subject: Public Law, Comparative Law, Constitutional Law, Administrative Law] ? ? ? ?
Описание: Part I Judicial Interpretation in Constitutional Democracies.- The Roles of Judges in Democracies: A Realistic View.- Is Realism at Odds with Constitutional Democracy?.- Judicial Supremacy as a Qualified Epistocratic Constraint on Democratic Rule.- Legal Identity of Judge Transformed: Images of Judge in Early Modern and Contemporary Democracy.- Part II Realist Jurisprudence (Re)Defined.- An Exercise in Legal Realism.- A Causal View of Judicial Interpretation.- Rule of Recognition and Methods of Interpretation.- Legal Interpretation and Epistemic Authority.- On the Distinction between Judicial Activism and Self-Restraint.- Part III Challenges to a Realist Jurisprudence.- Legal Realism as a Philosophy of Legal Doctrine.- On the Fundamental Distinction between Motives and Interpretation and the Consequences of Their Confusion - The Case for Strict Legal Scholarship.- A Critical Evaluation of (Moderate) Realism in Law.
Название: New challenges to constitutional adjudication in europe ISBN: 1138057894 ISBN-13(EAN): 9781138057890 Издательство: Taylor&Francis Рейтинг: Цена: 22202.00 р. Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ.
Описание: This book examines how new challenges such as the financial crisis, terrorism, mass migration and other country-specific problems have affected constitutional review in Europe. Adopting a common analytical structure, it examines how the issues have been addressed in ten individual countries.
Автор: Se-shauna Wheatle Название: Principled Reasoning in Human Rights Adjudication ISBN: 1782259813 ISBN-13(EAN): 9781782259817 Издательство: Bloomsbury Academic Рейтинг: Цена: 15048.00 р. Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ.
Описание: Implied constitutional principles form part of the landscape of the development of fundamental rights in common law jurisdictions, affecting issues ranging from the remuneration of judges to the appropriation of property by the state. Principled Reasoning in Human Rights Adjudication offers a thematic analysis of the use of the implied constitutional principles of the rule of law and separation of powers in human rights cases. The book examines the functions played by those principles in rights adjudication in Australia, Canada, the Commonwealth Caribbean, and the United Kingdom. It argues that a complete understanding of implied constitutional principles requires thoroughgoing analysis of the sources and methods of implication and of the specific roles played by such principles in the adjudicative process. By disaggregating particular functions and placing those functions within their respective institutional contexts, this book develops an understanding of the features of cases in which implied constitutional principles are invoked and the work is done by those principles. (Series: Hart Studies in Comparative Public Law, Vol. 15) Subject: Constitutional Law, Comparative Law, Public Law, Human Rights Law]
Автор: Juliano Zaiden Benvindo Название: On the Limits of Constitutional Adjudication ISBN: 3642423868 ISBN-13(EAN): 9783642423864 Издательство: Springer Рейтинг: Цена: 25853.00 р. Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ.
Описание: From the critical perception of the serious risks of this movement to democracy, the book takes as examples two constitutional realities, Germany and Brazil, in order to discuss the rationality, correctness, and legitimacy of constitutional decisions within this context.
Описание: Understood one way, the branch of contemporary philosophical ethics that goes by the label "metaethics" concerns certain second-order questions about ethics-questions not in ethics, but rather ones about our thought and talk about ethics, and how the ethical facts (insofar as there are any) fit into reality. Analogously, the branch of contemporary philosophy of law that is often called "general jurisprudence" deals with certain second order questions about law- questions not in the law, but rather ones about our thought and talk about the law, and how legal facts (insofar as there are any) fit into reality. Put more roughly (and using an alternative spatial metaphor), metaethics concerns a range of foundational questions about ethics, whereas general jurisprudence concerns analogous questions about law. As these characterizations suggest, the two sub-disciplines have much in common, and could be thought to run parallel to each other. Yet, the connections between the two are currently mostly ignored by philosophers, or at least under-scrutinized. The new essays collected in this book are aimed at changing this state of affairs. Dimensions of Normativity collects together works by metaethicists and legal philosophers that address a number of issues that are of common interest, with the goal of accomplishing a new rapprochement between the two sub-disciplines.
Описание: Part I Judicial Interpretation in Constitutional Democracies.- The Roles of Judges in Democracies: A Realistic View.- Is Realism at Odds with Constitutional Democracy?.- Judicial Supremacy as a Qualified Epistocratic Constraint on Democratic Rule.- Legal Identity of Judge Transformed: Images of Judge in Early Modern and Contemporary Democracy.- Part II Realist Jurisprudence (Re)Defined.- An Exercise in Legal Realism.- A Causal View of Judicial Interpretation.- Rule of Recognition and Methods of Interpretation.- Legal Interpretation and Epistemic Authority.- On the Distinction between Judicial Activism and Self-Restraint.- Part III Challenges to a Realist Jurisprudence.- Legal Realism as a Philosophy of Legal Doctrine.- On the Fundamental Distinction between Motives and Interpretation and the Consequences of Their Confusion - The Case for Strict Legal Scholarship.- A Critical Evaluation of (Moderate) Realism in Law.
Автор: John Bell, Mark Elliott, Jason NE Varuhas, Philip Murray Название: Public Law Adjudication in Common Law Systems: Process and Substance ISBN: 1509924450 ISBN-13(EAN): 9781509924455 Издательство: Bloomsbury Academic Рейтинг: Цена: 6968.00 р. Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ.
Описание: This volume arises from the inaugural Public Law Conference hosted in September 2014 by the Centre for Public Law at the University of Cambridge, which brought together leading public lawyers from a number of common law jurisdictions. While those from such jurisdictions share background understandings, significant differences within the common law world create opportunities for valuable exchanges of ideas and debate. This collection draws upon one of the principal sub-themes that emerged during the conference – namely, the the way in which relationships and distinctions between the notions of ‘process’ and ‘substance’ play out in relation to and inform adjudication in public law cases. The essays contained in this volume address those issues from a variety of perspectives. While the bulk of the chapters consider topical issues in judicial review, either on common law or human rights grounds, or both, other chapters adopt more theoretical, historical, empirical or contextual approaches. Concluding chapters reflect generally on the papers in the collection and the value of facilitating cross-jurisdictional dialogue.
Автор: Se-shauna Wheatle Название: Principled Reasoning in Human Rights Adjudication ISBN: 1509931325 ISBN-13(EAN): 9781509931323 Издательство: Bloomsbury Academic Рейтинг: Цена: 6334.00 р. Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ.
Описание: Implied constitutional principles form part of the landscape of the development of fundamental rights in common law jurisdictions, affecting issues ranging from the remuneration of judges to the appropriation of property by the state. Principled Reasoning in Human Rights Adjudication offers thematic analysis of the use of the implied constitutional principles of the rule of law and separation of powers in human rights cases. The book examines the functions played by those principles in rights adjudication in Australia, Canada, the Commonwealth Caribbean, and the United Kingdom. It argues that a complete understanding of implied constitutional principles requires thoroughgoing analysis of the sources and methods of implication and of the specific roles played by such principles in the adjudicative process. By disaggregating particular functions and placing those functions within their respective institutional contexts, this book develops an understanding of the features of cases in which implied constitutional principles are invoked and the work done by those principles.
Название: Constitutional adjudication in africa ISBN: 0198810210 ISBN-13(EAN): 9780198810216 Издательство: Oxford Academ Цена: 17820.00 р. Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ.
Описание: Providing the first comparative analysis of African attempts to promote respect for rule of law and constitutional justice, this book examines the diverse and distinctive approaches to constitutional adjudication taken. It captures positive and negative developments, and future prospects for the different models of constitutional review.
Описание: This book offers a new account of the power of federal courts in the United States to hear and determine uncontested applications to assert or register a claim of right. Familiar to lawyers in civil law countries as forms of voluntary or non-contentious jurisdiction, these uncontested applications fit uneasily with the commitment to adversary legalism in the United States. Indeed, modern accounts of federal judicial power often urge that the language of the Article III of the U.S. Constitution limits federal courts to the adjudication of concrete disputes between adverse parties, thereby ruling out all forms of non-contentious jurisdiction. Said to rest on the so-called �case-or-controversy� requirement of Article III, this requirement of party contestation threatens the power of federal courts to conduct a range of familiar proceedings, such as the oversight of bankruptcy proceedings, the issuance of warrants, and the adjudication of applications for mandamus and habeas corpus relief. By recounting the tradition of naturalization and other uncontested litigation in antebellum America and coupling that tradition with an account of the important difference between cases and controversies, this book challenges the prevailing understanding of Article III. In addition to defending the power of federal courts to hear uncontested matters of federal law, the book examines the way the Constitution's meaning has changed over time and suggests a constructive interpretive methodology that would allow the Supreme Court to take account of the old and the new in defining the contours of federal judicial power.
What is the value of fictions, metaphors, figures and scenarios in adjudication? This book develops three models to help answer that question: inquiry, artefacts and imagination.
Legal language, it is argued, contains artefacts - forms that signal their own artifice and call upon us to do things with them. To imagine, in turn, is to enter a distinctive epistemic frame where we temporarily suspend certain epistemic norms and commitments and participate actively along a spectrum of affective, sensory and kinesic involvement.
The book argues that artefacts and related processes of imagination are valuable insofar as they enable inquiry in adjudication, ie the social (interactive and collective) process of making insight into what values, vulnerabilities and interests might be at stake in a case and in similar cases in the future.
Artefacts of Legal Inquiry is structured in two parts, with the first offering an account of the three models of inquiry, artefacts and imagination, and the second examining four case studies (fictions, metaphors, figures and scenarios).
Drawing on a broad range of theoretical traditions - including philosophy of imagination and emotion, the theory and history of rhetoric, and the cognitive humanities - this book offers an interdisciplinary defence of the importance of artefactual language and imagination in adjudication.
ООО "Логосфера " Тел:+7(495) 980-12-10 www.logobook.ru
