Контакты/Проезд  Доставка и Оплата Помощь/Возврат
История
  +7(495) 980-12-10
  пн-пт: 10-18 сб,вс: 11-18
  shop@logobook.ru
   
    Поиск книг                    Поиск по списку ISBN Расширенный поиск    
Найти
  Зарубежные издательства Российские издательства  
Авторы | Каталог книг | Издательства | Новинки | Учебная литература | Акции | Хиты | |
 

Limits of Constraint: The Originalist Jurisprudence of Hugo Black, Antonin Scalia, and Clarence Thomas, James B. Staab


Варианты приобретения
Цена: 7523.00р.
Кол-во:
Наличие: Поставка под заказ.  Есть в наличии на складе поставщика.
Склад Америка: Есть  
При оформлении заказа до:
Ориентировочная дата поставки:
При условии наличия книги у поставщика.

Добавить в корзину
в Мои желания

Автор: James B. Staab
Название:  Limits of Constraint: The Originalist Jurisprudence of Hugo Black, Antonin Scalia, and Clarence Thomas
ISBN: 9780700633302
Издательство: Mare Nostrum (Eurospan)
Классификация:



ISBN-10: 0700633308
Обложка/Формат: Hardback
Страницы: 448
Вес: 0.72 кг.
Дата издания: 30.09.2022
Язык: English
Размер: 161 x 239 x 42
Ключевые слова: Constitution: government & the state,History of the Americas,Jurisprudence & philosophy of law,Legal history, HISTORY / United States / 20th Century,LAW / Jurisprudence,LAW / Legal History
Подзаголовок: The originalist jurisprudence of hugo black, antonin scalia, and clarence thomas
Рейтинг:
Поставляется из: Англии
Описание: Adherents of originalism often present it as a theory that constrains legal decision-making in a clear and objective manner that is based on the text and original meaning of the Constitution, in contrast to the supposedly subjective and “activist” jurisprudence of those who promote a living Constitution. But originalists have not had the same views on constitutional issues, calling into question the theory of originalism. Limits of Constraint examines the originalist jurisprudence of Hugo Black, Antonin Scalia, and Clarence Thomas, showing that three of the Court’s originalists have arrived at different conclusions in many constitutional areas. While the starkest contrast is between Justice Black and Justices Scalia and Thomas, even the latter two justices have disagreed on several key issues, including executive power and the administrative state. James Staab shows that originalism in actual practice does not deliver on its promise of an objective jurisprudence free of personal philosophy and discretion.Rather than rehash theoretical debates about the merits of originalism, Limits of Constraint examines originalism in operation by focusing on the judicial opinions of three prominent Supreme Court originalists: Hugo Black, Antonin Scalia, and Clarence Thomas. If the analysis of this book is correct—that is, the results reached by Justices Black, Scalia, and Thomas are divergent across a wide array of constitutional areas—then originalism promises more than it can deliver. One of the fundamental claims made by originalists is that their theory of constitutional interpretation limits judicial discretion, but originalism does not constrain judicial behavior as much as its defenders claim.
Дополнительное описание: Methods, theory and philosophy of law|Legal history|History of the Americas|Constitution: government and the state



Antonin Scalia and American Constitutionalism: The Historical Significance of a Judicial Icon

Автор: Purcell Jr Edward A.
Название: Antonin Scalia and American Constitutionalism: The Historical Significance of a Judicial Icon
ISBN: 0197508766 ISBN-13(EAN): 9780197508763
Издательство: Oxford Academ
Рейтинг:
Цена: 9826.00 р.
Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ.

Описание: Antonin Scalia and American Constitutionalism is an in-depth study of Justice Antonin Scalia`s jurisprudence, his work on the Supreme Court, and his significance in the history of American constitutionalism. This book reviews and criticizes his general jurisprudential theory, arguing that he failed to produce either the objective method he claimed or the correct constitutional results he promised.

The Conservative Revolution of Antonin Scalia

Автор: Schultz David A., Schweber Howard
Название: The Conservative Revolution of Antonin Scalia
ISBN: 149856450X ISBN-13(EAN): 9781498564502
Издательство: Bloomsbury
Рейтинг:
Цена: 5940.00 р.
Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ.

Описание: This collection is a comprehensive and thorough assessment of the impact and legacy that Justice Antonin Scalia had on the Supreme Court. Chapters are written by leading legal and political science scholars of the Supreme Court and examine the lasting legacy of one of the most controversial Supreme Court Justices in American history.

Conservative revolution of antonin scalia

Название: Conservative revolution of antonin scalia
ISBN: 1498564488 ISBN-13(EAN): 9781498564489
Издательство: Неизвестно
Рейтинг:
Цена: 35175.00 р.
Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ.

Описание: This collection is a comprehensive and thorough assessment of the impact and legacy that Justice Antonin Scalia had on the Supreme Court. Chapters are written by leading legal and political science scholars of the Supreme Court and examine the lasting legacy of one of the most controversial Supreme Court Justices in American history.

A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law

Автор: Scalia Antonin
Название: A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law
ISBN: 0691174040 ISBN-13(EAN): 9780691174044
Издательство: Wiley
Рейтинг:
Цена: 2691.00 р.
Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ.

Описание:

We are all familiar with the image of the immensely clever judge who discerns the best rule of common law for the case at hand. According to U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, a judge like this can maneuver through earlier cases to achieve the desired aim--"distinguishing one prior case on his left, straight-arming another one on his right, high-stepping away from another precedent about to tackle him from the rear, until (bravo ) he reaches the goal--good law." But is this common-law mindset, which is appropriate in its place, suitable also in statutory and constitutional interpretation? In a witty and trenchant essay, Justice Scalia answers this question with a resounding negative.

In exploring the neglected art of statutory interpretation, Scalia urges that judges resist the temptation to use legislative intention and legislative history. In his view, it is incompatible with democratic government to allow the meaning of a statute to be determined by what the judges think the lawgivers meant rather than by what the legislature actually promulgated. Eschewing the judicial lawmaking that is the essence of common law, judges should interpret statutes and regulations by focusing on the text itself. Scalia then extends this principle to constitutional law. He proposes that we abandon the notion of an everchanging Constitution and pay attention to the Constitution's original meaning. Although not subscribing to the "strict constructionism" that would prevent applying the Constitution to modern circumstances, Scalia emphatically rejects the idea that judges can properly "smuggle" in new rights or deny old rights by using the Due Process Clause, for instance. In fact, such judicial discretion might lead to the destruction of the Bill of Rights if a majority of the judges ever wished to reach that most undesirable of goals.

This essay is followed by four commentaries by Professors Gordon Wood, Laurence Tribe, Mary Ann Glendon, and Ronald Dworkin, who engage Justice Scalia's ideas about judicial interpretation from varying standpoints. In the spirit of debate, Justice Scalia responds to these critics.

Featuring a new foreword that discusses Scalia's impact, jurisprudence, and legacy, this witty and trenchant exchange illuminates the brilliance of one of the most influential legal minds of our time.


ООО "Логосфера " Тел:+7(495) 980-12-10 www.logobook.ru
   В Контакте     В Контакте Мед  Мобильная версия