Название: Chinese Civil Adjudications II ISBN: 1032719818 ISBN-13(EAN): 9781032719818 Издательство: Taylor&Francis Рейтинг: Цена: 20671.00 р. Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ.
Название: Chinese Civil Adjudications I ISBN: 1032719788 ISBN-13(EAN): 9781032719788 Издательство: Taylor&Francis Рейтинг: Цена: 20671.00 р. Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ.
Название: Chinese Civil Adjudications ISBN: 1032719648 ISBN-13(EAN): 9781032719641 Издательство: Taylor&Francis Рейтинг: Цена: 61248.00 р. Наличие на складе: Нет в наличии.
Автор: Juliano Zaiden Benvindo Название: On the Limits of Constitutional Adjudication ISBN: 3642423868 ISBN-13(EAN): 9783642423864 Издательство: Springer Рейтинг: Цена: 25853.00 р. Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ.
Описание: From the critical perception of the serious risks of this movement to democracy, the book takes as examples two constitutional realities, Germany and Brazil, in order to discuss the rationality, correctness, and legitimacy of constitutional decisions within this context.
Автор: Se-shauna Wheatle Название: Principled Reasoning in Human Rights Adjudication ISBN: 1509931325 ISBN-13(EAN): 9781509931323 Издательство: Bloomsbury Academic Рейтинг: Цена: 6334.00 р. Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ.
Описание: Implied constitutional principles form part of the landscape of the development of fundamental rights in common law jurisdictions, affecting issues ranging from the remuneration of judges to the appropriation of property by the state. Principled Reasoning in Human Rights Adjudication offers thematic analysis of the use of the implied constitutional principles of the rule of law and separation of powers in human rights cases. The book examines the functions played by those principles in rights adjudication in Australia, Canada, the Commonwealth Caribbean, and the United Kingdom. It argues that a complete understanding of implied constitutional principles requires thoroughgoing analysis of the sources and methods of implication and of the specific roles played by such principles in the adjudicative process. By disaggregating particular functions and placing those functions within their respective institutional contexts, this book develops an understanding of the features of cases in which implied constitutional principles are invoked and the work done by those principles.
Описание: The chapters collected in this book explore the place and role of judge-made private law in an emerging European polity.Examining case-law from the perspective of different theories and viewpoints, scholars and judges assess and reflect on the role of judges in civil cases for polity-building in Europe. The chapters thus present a kaleidoscopic view on the dynamics of private law adjudication against a European backdrop. The book aims to add a private legal perspective to existing discourses in European constitutional law on Europe’s political constellation. It aspires to enrich two debates – the first on the influence of fundamental rights in private legal relations, and the second on the constitutional dimension of European private law. The contributions are placed within a framework of five sub-categories or dimensions of judge-made European private law: politics of European private law adjudication, rights, remedies, representation and reflections of judges on specific cases.
Автор: Pollicino, Oreste Название: The Internet and Constitutional Law ISBN: 0367597152 ISBN-13(EAN): 9780367597153 Издательство: Taylor&Francis Рейтинг: Цена: 6430.00 р. Наличие на складе: Нет в наличии.
Автор: Anne Carter, Joe Tomlinson Название: Facts in Public Law Adjudication ISBN: 1509957383 ISBN-13(EAN): 9781509957385 Издательство: Bloomsbury Academic Рейтинг: Цена: 15048.00 р. Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ.
Описание: This book explores critical issues about how courts engage with questions of fact in public law adjudication. Although the topic of judicial review — the mechanism through which individuals can challenge governmental action — continues to generate sustained interest amongst constitutional and administrative lawyers, there has been little attention given to questions of fact. This is so despite such determinations of fact often being hugely important to the outcomes and impacts of public law adjudication. The book brings together scholars from across the common law world to identify and explore contested issues, common challenges, and gaps in understanding. The various chapters consider where facts arise in constitutional and administrative law proceedings, the role of the courts, and the types of evidence that might assist courts in determining legal issues that are underpinned by complex and contested social or policy questions. The book also considers whether the existing laws and practices surrounding evidence are sufficient, and how other disciplines might assist the courts. The book reconnects the key practical issues surrounding evidence and facts with the lively academic debate on judicial review in the common law world; it therefore contributes to an emerging area of scholarly debate and also has practical implications for the conduct of litigation and government policy-making.
Автор: Carter Anne, Barzun Charles, Visser Maartje de Название: Proportionality and Facts in Constitutional Adjudication ISBN: 150993698X ISBN-13(EAN): 9781509936984 Издательство: Bloomsbury Academic Рейтинг: Цена: 27588.00 р. Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ.
Описание:
This book considers the relationship between proportionality and facts in constitutional adjudication. Analysing where facts arise within each of the three stages of the structured proportionality test - suitability, necessity, and balancing - it considers the nature of these 'facts' vis-а-vis the facts that arise in the course of ordinary litigation.
The book's central focus is on how proportionality has been applied by courts in practice, and it draws on the comparative experience of four jurisdictions across a range of legal systems. The central case study of the book is Australia, where the embryonic and contested nature of proportionality means it provides an illuminating study of how facts can inform the framing of constitutional tests. The rich proportionality jurisprudence from Germany, Canada, and South Africa is used to contextualise the approach of the High Court of Australia and to identify future directions for proportionality in Australia, at a time when the doctrine is in its formative stages. The book has three broad aims: First, it considers the role of facts within proportionality reasoning. Second, it offers procedural insights into fact-finding in constitutional litigation. Third, the book's analysis of the dynamic Australian case-law on proportionality means it also serves to clarify the nature and status of proportionality in Australia at a critical moment. Since the 2015 decision of McCloy v New South Wales, where four justices supported the introduction of a structured three-part test of proportionality, the Court has continued to disagree about the utility of such a test. These developments mean that this book, with its doctrinal and comparative approach, is particularly timely.
Описание: Part I Judicial Interpretation in Constitutional Democracies.- The Roles of Judges in Democracies: A Realistic View.- Is Realism at Odds with Constitutional Democracy?.- Judicial Supremacy as a Qualified Epistocratic Constraint on Democratic Rule.- Legal Identity of Judge Transformed: Images of Judge in Early Modern and Contemporary Democracy.- Part II Realist Jurisprudence (Re)Defined.- An Exercise in Legal Realism.- A Causal View of Judicial Interpretation.- Rule of Recognition and Methods of Interpretation.- Legal Interpretation and Epistemic Authority.- On the Distinction between Judicial Activism and Self-Restraint.- Part III Challenges to a Realist Jurisprudence.- Legal Realism as a Philosophy of Legal Doctrine.- On the Fundamental Distinction between Motives and Interpretation and the Consequences of Their Confusion - The Case for Strict Legal Scholarship.- A Critical Evaluation of (Moderate) Realism in Law.
Описание: This series analyses the public law of the European legal space, which encompasses the law of the EU, the European Convention on Human Rights, and the domestic public laws of European states. This volume analyses the history, organization, and procedure of constitutional adjudication and outlines the historical process and current outlook.
Автор: Anne Carter Название: Proportionality and Facts in Constitutional Adjudication ISBN: 1509955496 ISBN-13(EAN): 9781509955497 Издательство: Bloomsbury Academic Рейтинг: Цена: 6810.00 р. Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ.
Описание: This book considers the relationship between proportionality and facts in constitutional adjudication. Analysing where facts arise within each of the three stages of the structured proportionality test – suitability, necessity, and balancing – it considers the nature of these ‘facts’ vis-a-vis the facts that arise in the course of ordinary litigation. The book’s central focus is on how proportionality has been applied by courts in practice, and it draws on the comparative experience of four jurisdictions across a range of legal systems. The central case study of the book is Australia, where the embryonic and contested nature of proportionality means it provides an illuminating study of how facts can inform the framing of constitutional tests. The rich proportionality jurisprudence from Germany, Canada, and South Africa is used to contextualise the approach of the High Court of Australia and to identify future directions for proportionality in Australia, at a time when the doctrine is in its formative stages.The book has three broad aims:First, it considers the role of facts within proportionality reasoning. Second, it offers procedural insights into fact-finding in constitutional litigation. Third, the book’s analysis of the dynamic Australian case-law on proportionality means it also serves to clarify the nature and status of proportionality in Australia at a critical moment. Since the 2015 decision of McCloy v New South Wales, where four justices supported the introduction of a structured three-part test of proportionality, the Court has continued to disagree about the utility of such a test. These developments mean that this book, with its doctrinal and comparative approach, is particularly timely.
ООО "Логосфера " Тел:+7(495) 980-12-10 www.logobook.ru
