Teson, Fernando; van der Vossen, Bas Debating Humanitarian Intervention 9780190202910

Варианты приобретения

Цена: 3166.00р.
Кол-во:
Наличие: Поставка под заказ. Есть в наличии на складе поставщика.
Склад Америка: Есть
При оформлении заказа до: 2025-08-04
Ориентировочная дата поставки: Август-начало Сентября
При условии наличия книги у поставщика.

Добавить в корзину

в Мои желания

Автор: Teson, Fernando; van der Vossen, Bas
Название: Debating Humanitarian Intervention
ISBN: 9780190202910
Издательство: Oxford Academ
Классификация:

Этика и философия нравов

Социальная и политическая философия

Международное гуманитарное право

ISBN-10: 0190202912
Обложка/Формат: Paperback
Страницы: 288
Вес: 0.34 кг.
Дата издания: 25.01.2018
Серия: Debating Ethics
Язык: English
Размер: 208 x 139 x 21
Читательская аудитория: Philosophers, legal scholars, undergraduate and graduate students.
Основная тема: Social & Political Philosophy
Подзаголовок: Should We Try to Save Strangers?
Ссылка на Издательство: Link
Рейтинг:
Поставляется из: Англии
Описание: When foreign powers attack civilians, other countries face an impossible dilemma. Two courses of action emerge: either to retaliate against an abusive government on behalf of its victims, or to remain spectators. Either course offers its own perils: the former, lost lives and resources without certainty of restoring peace or preventing worse problems from proliferating; the latter, cold spectatorship that leaves a country at the mercy of corrupt rulers or to revolution.

Philosophers Fernando Tes�n and Bas van der Vossen offer contrasting views of humanitarian intervention, defining it as either war aimed at ending tyranny, or as violence. The authors employ the tools of impartial modern analytic philosophy, particularly just war theory, to substantiate their claims. According to Tes�n, a humanitarian intervention has the same just cause as a justified revolution: ending tyranny. He analyzes the different kinds of just cause and whether or not an intervener may pursue other justified causes. For Tes�n, the permissibility of humanitarian intervention is almost exclusively determined by the rules of proportionality. Bas van der Vossen, by contrast, holds that military intervention is morally impermissible in almost all cases. Justified interventions, Van der Vossen argues, must have high ex ante chance of success. Analyzing the history and prospects of intervention shows that they almost never do.

Tes�n and van der Vossen refer to concrete cases, and weigh the consequences of continued or future intervention in Syria, Somalia, Rwanda, Bosnia, Iraq, Lybia and Egypt. By placing two philosophers in dialogue, Debating Humanitarian Intervention is not constrained by a single, unifying solution to the exclusion of all others. Rather, it considers many conceivable actions as judged by analytic philosophy, leaving the reader equipped to make her own, informed judgments.

Дополнительное описание: Introduction; Fernando Teson and Bas van der Vossen; Part I: A defense of humanitarian intervention Fernando Teson; 1. Humanitarian intervention as defense of persons; 2. Just cause in humanitarian intervention; 3. Intervention and revolution: the equival

Debating Humanitarian Intervention, Teson, Fernando; van der Vossen, Bas