Good Practice Guide: Adjudication, Coombes-Davis, Mair

Автор: Tripkovic Bosko
Название: The Metaethics of Constitutional Adjudication
ISBN: 0198808089 ISBN-13(EAN): 9780198808084
Издательство: Oxford Academ
Рейтинг:
Цена: 28393.00 р.
Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ.

Описание: Analysis of case law from the US, Germany, South Africa, Canada, Israel, and the ECtHR forms the basis of Tripkovic`s exploration of constitutional adjudication from an antirealist standpoint. This highly original work identifies the salient value-based arguments in constitutional practice and exposes the implicit assumptions that lie therein.

Автор: Pfander James E.
Название: Cases Without Controversies: Uncontested Adjudication in Article III Courts
ISBN: 0197571409 ISBN-13(EAN): 9780197571408
Издательство: Oxford Academ
Рейтинг:
Цена: 27301.00 р.
Наличие на складе: Есть у поставщика Поставка под заказ.

Описание: This book offers a new account of the power of federal courts in the United States to hear and determine uncontested applications to assert or register a claim of right. Familiar to lawyers in civil law countries as forms of voluntary or non-contentious jurisdiction, these uncontested
applications fit uneasily with the commitment to adversary legalism in the United States. Indeed, modern accounts of federal judicial power often urge that the language of the Article III of the U.S. Constitution limits federal courts to the adjudication of concrete disputes between adverse
parties, thereby ruling out all forms of non-contentious jurisdiction. Said to rest on the so-called �case-or-controversy� requirement of Article III, this requirement of party contestation threatens the power of federal courts to conduct a range of familiar proceedings, such as the oversight of
bankruptcy proceedings, the issuance of warrants, and the adjudication of applications for mandamus and habeas corpus relief. By recounting the tradition of naturalization and other uncontested litigation in antebellum America and coupling that tradition with an account of the important difference
between cases and controversies, this book challenges the prevailing understanding of Article III. In addition to defending the power of federal courts to hear uncontested matters of federal law, the book examines the way the Constitution's meaning has changed over time and suggests a constructive
interpretive methodology that would allow the Supreme Court to take account of the old and the new in defining the contours of federal judicial power.